The Pros and Cons of English-medium Instruction in Higher Education in an EFL Context

Sibel Çağatay

Abstract


English learning has gained a momentum considering its notable role and status worldwide; therefore, the widespread view is that the medium of education is to be English, as higher education in this era aims at preparing students for an international career. Some opponents, however, claim that English-medium instruction (EMI) puts certain burden on learners’ as well as teachers’ shoulders. Considering this disparity, this study purports to delve into 146 undergraduate students’ perceptions on EMI at a state university in Turkey where EMI started to be implemented for the first time and it also aims to reveal whether gender affects their beliefs on EMI.

A composite questionnaire including 5-point Likert scale and open-ended questions were administered to 146 students. Data were analyzed through SPSS version 21 using descriptive statistics, frequencies and independent-samples t-test. As for the open-ended responses, deductive qualitative analyses were made. Overall, findings showed that 63 % of the students in the English language teaching department and 59.26 % of the students registered in other departments believe that the instruction at higher education needs to be conducted in English. More specifically, accessing to a wide range of resources easily, employment opportunities, and contribution to academic success have been mostly appreciated upsides of EMI. Conversely, a high number of participants noted that EMI prevents being involved in the subject matter and comprehending it fully. Lastly, gender seems to be influential in EMI at a statistically significant level. In language learning contexts, the path to follow might be to help learners to be highly proficient to be equipped well enough to follow the content in their majors during their studies. This can be best achieved by a great collaboration between content and language specialists while exploiting such gaining of EMI as accessing to different resources and finding jobs as global citizens.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alptekin, C., & Tatar, S. (2011). Research on foreign language teaching and learning in Turkey (2005–2009).Language Teaching, 44(3), 328–353.

Arkın, İ.E. (2013).English-medium instruction in higher education: A Case Study in a Turkish University Context. East Mediterranean University, (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Northern Cyprus.

Arslantunalı, M. (1998). Education in yabancı dil: There are çok problems [Education in English: There are many problems]. In A. Kilimci (Ed.), Anadilinde çocuk olmak: Yabancı dilde eğitim [To be a hild in mother-tongue: Education in foreign language] (pp. 74–76). Istanbul: Papirüs Yayinevi.

Atik, E. (2010). Perceptions of students towards English medium instruction at tertiary level: The case of a Turkish private university. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Cohen, J. W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd Ed.)Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.

Coleman, J. A. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39, 1-14.

Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual

Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010).CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: CUP.

Crystal, D. (2012). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the cross-fire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Demircan, Ö. (2006). Öğrenci açısından yabancı dil öğretimi ile yabancı ilişkisi[The relationship between foreign language education and foreign-medium education fromthe learner’s point of view]. Paper presented in a meeting of Language and Communication Society at Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Demirezen, M. (2007). Identity Problems of Non-native Teachers of English in Teacher Education, The Internet TESL Journal, 13(8). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Demirezen-NonNativeTeachers.html.

Doiz, A. &Lasagabaster, D.& Sierra, J.M. (2011).Internationalisation, multilingualism and English-medium instruction. World Englishes. 3 (3), 345-359.

Duman, A. (1997). Yabancı dilde eğitim üzerine [On education in foreign language]. Bilim ve Ütopya. Retrieved from http://www.dergimiz.biz/yabanci-dilde-egitim-uzerine.htm

Görgülü, B. (1998). Foreign language medium education in secondary schools in Turkey (Unpublished master’s thesis), Middle East Technical University, Ankara.

Graddol, D. (1999). The decline of the native speaker. In D. Graddol& U. H.Hellekjaer, G. O.&Westergaard, M. R. (2003). An exploratory survey of content learning through English at Nordic universities. In C. Van Leeuwen & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), Multilingual approaches in university education: Challenges and practices (pp. 65-80). Maastricht, Netherlands: Universiteit Maastricht &Uitgeverij Valkhof Pers.

Hult, F. M. (2010). Educational Linguistics: Directions and Prospects for Educational Linguistics. Springer Science & Business Media.

İbrahim,J. (2001). The Implementation of EMI (English Medium Instruction) in Indonesian Universities: Its Opportunities, its Threats, its Problems, and its Possible Solutions. Conference. Paper resented at 49th International Teflin Conference, Bali.

Kırkgöz, Y. (2005). Motivation and student perception of studying in an English- medium university. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1).

Köksal, A. (2002). Yabancı dilde öğretim: Türkiye’nin büyük yanılgısı [Foreign-medium instruction: Turkey’s great delusion]. Ankara: Öğretmen Dünyası.

Lasagabaster, D. (2016). The relationship between motivation, gender, L1 and possible selves in English-medium instruction. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(3), 315-332.

Macaro, E., Akincioglu, M., &Dearden, J. (2016). English medium instruction in universities: A collaborative experiment in Turkey. Studies in English Language Teaching, 4(1), 51.

Macaro, E. (2017). English medium instruction: Global views and countries in focus: Introduction to the symposium held at the Department of Education, University of Oxford on Wednesday 4 November 2015. Language Teaching, 1-18.

Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., &Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36-76.

Macaro, E., & Akincioglu, M. (2018). Turkish university students’ perceptions about English Medium Instruction: exploring year group, gender and university type as variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(3), 256-270.

Pennycook, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism.London:Routledge.

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: OUP.

Phillipson, R., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1999).Englishisation: One dimension of lobalisation. In D. Graddol& U. H. Meinhof (Eds.), English in a changing world. AILA Review, 13,19-36.

Reagan, T. G.(2009). Language matters: reflections on educational linguistics. USA: Information Age Publishing Inc.

Sarıçoban, G. (2012). Foreign language education policies in Turkey.Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,46, 2643–2648.

Sayarı, I. M. (2007). Implications of foreign language learning in terms of Turkey’s cultural integration into the EU: A survey study on EFL students in Turkey. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).Marmara University, Istanbul.

Selvi, A.F. (2014): The medium-of-instruction debate in Turkey: oscillating between national ideas and bilingual ideals, Current Issues in Language Planning, DOI:10.1080/14664208.2014.898357

Sert, N. (2008). The language of instruction dilemma in the Turkish context. System, 36, 156–171.

Sinanoğlu, O. (2000). Bye bye Türkçe. Istanbul: Otopsi Yayınları.

Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tollefson, J. W. (Ed.) (2002). Language policies in education: Critical issues.London: Lawrance Erlbaum.

Tollefson, J. W., &Tsui, A. B. M. (Eds.) (2004).Medium of instruction policies: Whichagenda? Whose agenda? London: Lawrance Erlbaum.

Turhan, B., & Kırkgöz, Y. (2018). Motivation of engineering students and lecturers toward English medium instruction at tertiary level in Turkey. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 261-277.

Wong, R. M. (2010). The effectiveness of using English as the sole medium of instruction in English classes: Student responses and improved English proficiency. Porta Linguarum: Revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, (13), 119-130.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.