Using Socrative Student Response System to Learn Phrasal Verbs

Ruby Vurdien

Abstract


Abstract

Learning phrasal verbs, which are an essential part of the English language, can be a challenge for EFL students, since they find it difficult to remember the large number of these lexical items that are used in both spoken and written forms of the language. However, with the aid of technological applications, for example, Socrative, learning phrasal verbs can be more entertaining and dynamic. This paper reports on a study which involved 33 EFL students of three different levels of English (B2, C1 and C2 on the CEFR scale), who did reading and vocabulary exercises on Google forms prior to participating in competitive quizzes on Socrative. The aim of the study was to explore how the use of a Student Response System via quizzes on Socrative can arouse students’ interest in learning phrasal verbs. The research examined the students’ perceptions of their learning experience and to what extent they were motivated to acquire this lexicon via quizzes. The findings indicate that the general overview of the students’ novel approach to learning in this way was positive, and that competing both against themselves and their peers played a significant role in their learning experience. Easily accessible on any portable device, Socrative can be seen as a reliable educational tool to enhance language learning.

Keywords: Phrasal verbs, Socrative, Student Response System, Quizzes, Competitions


Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Nasarat, S. A. (2017). The Dilemma of Learning Phrasal Verbs among EFL learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 119-125.

Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught . International Journal of Teaching and Education, Vol. III(3), 21-34.

Awdeh, M., Mueen, A., Zafar, B. & Manzour, U. (2014). Using Socrative and smart phones for the support of collaborative learning. International Journal on integration Technology in Education, 3, 17-24.

Azzaro, G. (2012). Phrasal verbs through DDL. Journal of Theories and Research in Education, 7(2), 1-24.

Babaie, Z., & Nourdad, N. (2014). The effect of quiz and oral questioning on vocabulary learning and retention of EFL learners. Journal of Language, Literature and Humanities, 2(5), 253-268.

Bälter, O., Enström, E., & Klingenberg, B. (2013). The effect of short formative diagnostic web quizzes with minimal feedback. Computers & Education, 60, 234-242.

Boulton A. (2008). Looking for empirical evidence of data-driven learning at lower levels. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Corpus Linguistics, Computer Tools, and Applications. State of the Art (pp. 581-598). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Bradford-Networks (2013). The Impact of BYOD in Education. Bradford Networks.

Brophy, J. E. (2013). Motivating students to learn. New York: Routledge.

Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom. Current research and best practice tips. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20.

Chan, S. C. H., Wan, C. L. J. & Ko, S. (2019). Interactivity, active collaborative learning, and learning performance: The moderating role of perceived fun by using personal response systems. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(1), 94-102.

Chen, M.H. (2019). Computer-assisted synonymous phrase learning: A feasible approach to lexical development. IJCALLT, 9(2), 1-18.

Cheon, Y. (2006). A Pilot Study in Learning English Phrasal Verbs. http://www.pdfdrive.net/apilot-study-in-learning-english-phrasal-verbs-E6254324.html (Retrieved on 4 March, 2020).

Cirocki, A. (2003). Teaching Phrasal Verbs by Means of Constructing Texts. ELT Newsletter. http://www.eltnewsletter.com/column/shtml. (Retrieved on 5 April 2020).

Cock S.D. (2006). Learners and phrasal verbs. MED Magazine, 35(1), 1-6.

Dahlstrom, E. (2012). ECAR Study of undergraduate students and information technology, (Research Report). Louisville, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.

Dainty, P. (1992). Phrasal Verbs in Context. Macmillan Education.

Dakka, S.M. (2015). Using Socrative to enhance in-class student engagement and collaboration. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 4, 13–19.

Darwin, C. M., & Gray, L. S. (1999). Going after the phrasal verbs: An alternative approach to classification. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 65-83.

Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G. & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Education Technology and Society, 18, 75–88.

Duffy, T.M., & Jonassen, D.H. (1991). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology? Educational Technology, 31(5), 7-11.

El Shaban, A. (2017). The use of Socrative in ESL classrooms: Towards active learning. Teaching English with Technology, 17, 64–77.

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus-on-form. System, 30, 419–432.

Faya Cerqueiro, F. & Martin-Macho Harrison A. (2019). Socrative in Higher Education: Games vs Other Uses. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 3(49), 1-19.

Gardner, D. & Davies, M. (2007). Pointing Out Frequent Phrasal Verbs: A Corpus-Based Analysis. Tesol Quarterly 41(2), 339-359.

Ghasemi, B. & Hashemi, M. (2011). ICT: New wave in English language learning/teaching. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3098–3102.

Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J. & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91–99.

Hung, H.T. (2017). Clickers in the flipped classroom: bring your own device (BYOD) to promote student learning. Interactive Learning Environment, 25, 983–995.

Kao, R. (2001). Where have the prepositions gone? A study of English prepositional verbs and input enhancement in instructed SLA. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 39, 195-215.

Kaya, A., & Balta, N. (2016). Taking advantages of technologies: Using the Socrative in English language teaching classes. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 2, 4–12.

Kaya, H. (2015). Blending technology with constructivism: Implications for an ELT classroom. Teaching English with Technology, 15(1), 3-13.

Kessler, G., & Hubbard, P. (2017). Language teacher education and technology. In C. Chapelle & S. Sauro (Eds.), The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 278-292). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kohnke, L. (2020). Exploring learner perception, experience and motivation of using a mobile app in L2 vocabulary acquisition. IJCALLT, 10(1), 15-26.

Koprowski, M. (2005). Investigating the Usefulness of Lexical Phrases in Contemporary Coursebooks. ELT Journal, 59(4), 322-332.

Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 85–97.

Laufer, B. & Eliasson, S. (1993). What causes avoidance in L2 learning: L1-L2 difference, L1-L2 similarity or L2 complexity? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(1), 35-48.

Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical Approach. London: Language Teaching Publications.

Liao, Y. & Fukuya, Y. J. (2004). Avoidance of phrasal verbs: the case of Chinese participants of English. Language Learning, 54(2), 193-226.

Maesaroh M, Abdurrachman, F. & Dwi Anggani, L. B. (2020). The effectiveness of Socrative and Kahoot to teach grammar to students with different interests. English Education Journal, 10(3), 366-373.

Mehring, J. (2016). Present research on the flipped classroom and potential tools for the EFL classroom. Computers in the Schools, 33, 1–10.

Mork, C. M. (2014). Benefits of using online student response system in Japanese EFL classroom. The JALTCALL Journal, 10(2), 127-137.

Ohashi, L. (2015). Enhancing EFL writing courses with the online student response system Socrative. Kokusaikeiei Bunkakenkyu , 19, 135–145.

Perkins, D.N. (1991). What constructivism demands of the learner? Educational Technology, 39(9), 9-21.

Pitler, H. & Hubbell, E. (2007). Using Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD Publication Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Reinders, H., & Pegrum, M. (2016). Supporting language learning on the move. An evaluative framework for mobile language learning resources. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.), SLA Research and Materials Development for Language Learning (pp. 116-141). New York, NY: Routledge.

Roediger, H. L., Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. In J. Mestre & B. Ross (Eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation Cognition in Education (pp. 1–36). Oxford: Elsevier.

Rosca, A. & Baicchi, A. (2016). Digging up the frequency of phrasal verbs in English for the Police: the case of up. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 67, 273-296.

Schacter, J. & Fagnano. C. (1999). Does computer technology improve student learning and achievement? How, when, and under what conditions? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(4), 329–43.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17–45.

Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Teaching and Learning (Technical report No. 9), pp. 1-64). Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.

Seidl, J. (1990). English Idioms: Exercises on Phrasal Verbs. Oxford University Press : Oxford, UK.

Seifoori, Z. & Ahmadi, H. (2017). EFL learners’ learning and retention of phrasal verbs and lexical collocations: Contributions from formative assessment. Journal of Modern Research in English Language studies, 4(2), 47-62.

Sheen, R. (2002). ‘Focus on form’ and ‘focus on forms.’ ELT Journal, 56(3), 303-305.

Sinclair, J. (1989). Collins Cobuild Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs . London, Uk.

Siyanova A. & Schmitt N. (2007). Native and nonnative use of multi-word vs one-word verbs. IRAL, 45(2), 119-139.

Sprague, A. (2016). Improving the ESL graduate writing classroom using Socrative: (Re) considering exit tickets. TESOL J., 7, 989–998.

Teng M. (2018). The effect of focus on form and focus on form instruction on the acquisition of phrasal verbs by Chinese students. Asian EFL Journal, June 2018, 145-173.

Teng, F. (2015). The effectiveness of extensive reading on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning: Incidental versus intentional learning. Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 6, 82- 96.

Teng, F. (2017). The effectiveness of group, pair and individual output tasks on learning phrasal verbs. The Language Learning Journal, 45, 1-14.

Terrion, J. L. & Aceti, V. (2012). Perceptions of the effects of clicker technology on student learning and engagement: a study of freshmen Chemistry students. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 16-30.

Thornbury, S. (2004). How to teach vocabulary. Longman: Pearson Education Limited.

Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. Harlow: Longman.

Trask, R. L. (1993). A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.

Trindade, J. (2014). Promoção da interatividade na sala de aula com Socrative: estudo de caso. Indagatio Didact, 6(1), 20-30.

Tyler, A. & Evans, V. ( 2004). Applying cognitive linguistics to pedagogical grammar: The case of over. In M. Achard, and S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching (pp.257-280). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Vurdien, R. (2020). Enhancing Writing Skills via Mobile Learning and Wikis. In B. Zou and M. Thomas (Eds.), Recent Developments in Technology-Enhanced and Computer-Assisted Language Learning (pp. 99-121). IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA.

Wyss, R. (2002). Teaching English Multi-Word Verbs Is Not a Lost Cause After All. ELT Newsletter.

http://www.eltnewsletter.com/back/March2002/art902002.htm. Retrieved on 5 April 2020

Zhonggen, Y. (2017). The influence of clickers use on metacognition and learning outcomes in college English classroom. In L. Tomei (Ed.), Exploring the New Era of Technology-Infused Education (pp. 158-171). IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.